The Lagos State Government said there was no going back on its decision to enforce the state law and reclaim drainage setbacks following the expiration of notices issued.

This came as it stated that the ongoing removal of all contravening structures under the system 1 drainage channel midstream (Odo Iya Alaro) Ojota and Ogudu, will address major flooding issues on the mainland and its environs.

State Commissioner for the Environment and Water Resources, Mr. Tokunbo Wahab, made these assertions on Sunday, when he alongside the Special Adviser on Environment, Tokunbo Wahab, led the management on an inspection tour to the enforcement sites to ascertain the level of compliance by property owners and extent of work.

Wahab explained that System 1 was established in 1974 and it is the biggest and widest Primary Channel that defloods the major parts of the mainland which cutting across Ogudu, Ojota, Ifako, Gbagada, Maryland, adding that the flyover bridge coming from Odo Iyaloro will cut across those areas.

He stressed that the government had been having discussions with property owners/residents since the year 2021 and the conversation ended in November 2023 stating that contravention notices had been served to owners of buildings lying within the 140 metres of System 1 since year 2021.

“We found out that people have gone back to encroach on the right of way and alignments. Since 2021, we have been engaging the homeowners and residents where government has been notifying them of impending enforcement without which we cannot abate flooding,” he said.

The commissioner explained that property owners whose buildings fall within the approved 140 meters Right of Way of the channel had been given the option of voluntary compliance for almost three years now.

He added that the government also discovered that while contravention notices had been served and dialogue on way forward was being explored, some of the property owners continued with the construction of new buildings that surfaced in the areas now.

Wahab, explained that the property owners/ residents affected were advised for about three years to voluntarily remove the contravening structures before the state government officials commenced the enforcement but were foot dragging.